Wisconsin Voters for Companion Animals

Advocating for animals through informed voting

Home     JOIN US     About Us     Contact Us     Current Assembly     Archives2010      
Legislation
Questionnaire Responses
Scorecard-Senate
Scorecard-Assembly
High Scorers
Questionnaire
Election 2010 Archives

Explanation & Legends for Senate Scorecard

Points Awarded

5=Authored
2=Co-sponsored
1=Yes
0=No
blanks=Absent 

*100% = Scored over 100% with bonus points  

*Colored cells  when the final score was 50% or more. 

The darker the color the more animal friendly. 


White cells represent  scores under 50%

Red text = Republican       Blue text=Democrat

Green text=Independent

FINAL %
*100%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%

LEGEND FOR HEADING ABREVIATIONS AND COLORS 
HEADINGS

Bills represented in Headings

Bill Numbers

PM A/C 

Puppy Mill Authored/Co-Sponsored

AB250/SB208

PM-V 

Puppy Mill Recorded Vote

AB250/SB209

F A/C

Felon Bill Authored/Co-Sponsored

SB496

WC A/C

Windchill's  Bill Authored/Co-Sponsored

AB747/SB555

WC-V

Windchill's Bill Recorded Vote

AB747/SB556

C A/C

Custody Bill Authored/Co-Sponsored

AB793/SB580

AF A/C

Anti-Freeze Bill Authored/Co-Sponsored

AB842/SB663

AF-V

Anti-Freeze Bill Recorded Vote

AB842/SB664

ES A/C

Equine Slaughter Bill Authored/Co-Sponsored

SB142

DB A/C

Dog Breeder Bill Authored/Co-Sponsored

SB110

 

How FINAL %  Scores Were Calculated

Many
 animal protection issues never receive a recorded vote. Some are enacted by voice vote which is not a recorded vote therefore it cannot be measured.  Some bills languish and never reach a vote and are referred to as "dead" or "died in committee."   

Only
the recorded votes were counted in the voting record.  We also gave points to legislator's who authored (5 points) or co-sponsored (2 points) because these are necessary for the legislation process to begin. 

 

The maximum score posted is 100%, but some legislators could score higher if they had received  the 5 point bonuses for authoring a bill, which  those are indicated as *100% (with an asterisk). 

 

We realize the limitations of judging legislators based on a few votes and  cosponsor-ships, therefore we are sending questionnaires to all current legislators and candidates to survey their stance on companion animal issues which have passed in other states.  We will post the results as they become available. 

 

Note:  In some cases, legislators must miss votes for unavoidable reasons, we have used blanks to indicate when a vote was absent.

         

MS Live
Hotmail
 


AOL

 SENATE SCORECARD

SENATE 2009-10 PM A/C V F A/C WC A/C C A/C AF A/C ES A/C DBA/C FINAL%
Carpenter, Tim 2 1   2 2 2     *100%
Coggs, Spencer 2 1             38%
Cowles, Robert 2 1             38%
Darling, Alberta 2 1           5 100%
Decker, Russ   1             13%
Ellis, Michael G.   1             13%
Erpenbach, Jon   1     2       38%
Fitzgerald, Scott 2 1         2   63%
Grothman, Glenn   1             13%
Hansen, Dave 2 1 5 2     2   *100%
Harsdorf, Shelia   1             13%
Holperin, Jim 2 1             38%
Hopper, Randy 2 1             38%
Jauch, Bob   1   5         75%
Kanavas, Ted 2 1             38%
Kapanke, Dan 2 1             38%
Kedzie, Neal   1             13%
Kreitlow, Pat 5 1             75%
Lasee, Alan J. 2 1             38%
Lassa, Julie 2 1       2 2   88%
Lazich, Mary   1             13%
Lehman, John W. 2 1             38%
Leibham, Joseph 2 1             38%
Miller, Mark   1     2 2     63%
Olsen, Luther 2 1             38%
Plale, Jeff 2 1       2 5   *100%
Risser, Fred A. 2 1   2 5 2     *100%
Robson, Judith B.                 0%
Schultz, Dale W. 2 1       2     63%
Sullivan, Jim 2 1             38%
Taylor, Lena C. 2 1         2   63%
Vinehout, Kathleen   1             13%
Wirch, Robert 2 1             38%